Australian Press Council
 

Complaints not adjudicated: 2008-2009

This year's report noted a small percentage of complaints, only 13 per cent, progressed through the complaints procedures (published in the Council's information booklet, Objects, Principles and Complaints Procedure, available from the office and posted on the Council's website at: http://www.presscouncil.org,au/pcsite/complaints/process.html) to the adjudication stage in 2008-2009. This figure can be compared with previous years, in the table in the annual report. Of the remaining complaints, some were refused, some referred to another body and others withdrawn for legal action. Details of the number in each category can be found in the statistics on page 47. 7.3 per cent of complainants did not follow-up a request from the Secretariat for more detail on their complaints. And then there are those complainants who were happy to let their complaint rest after receiving the publication's response to the complaint and those whose complaints were conciliated either by the Council Secretariat or by a Public Member of the Council. 47.5 per cent of all complaints ended in this way - to the satisfaction of all parties.

The complaints process gives to the Executive Secretary a discretion to refuse a complaint in a number of circumstances. In previous annual reports, there has been discussion of some of these. Complainants who feel aggrieved can appeal the decision to the Council's Complaints Committee, which decides whether to accept the matter for processing. In exceptionally rare circumstances, publications can appeal the acceptance of what they see as an unfair complaint.

In one particular case this year, fifty-five complaints were received from complainants associated with a website, which encouraged complaints about a series of articles in The Australian on the question of shared custody among separated/divorced couples. Many of the complaints alleged bias, and the rest inaccuracy. Based on his reading of the articles, the Executive Secretary determined that there was no breach of the Council's Principles evidenced in the articles and all were refused.

Conciliated complaints

A number of the complainants conciliated successfully by the secretariat, or by an independent member of the Council, and the sorts of settlements arrived at, are outlined in each edition of the APC News, and these are published on the Council's website.

[ return to top ]

View the details of complaints not adjudicated for each of the following years:

Not Adjudicated Overview
Not Adjudicated 2008-2009
Not Adjudicated 2007-2008
Not Adjudicated 2006-2007
Not Adjudicated 2005-2006
Not Adjudicated 2004-2005
Not Adjudicated 2003-2004
Not Adjudicated 2002-2003
Not Adjudicated 2001-2002
Not Adjudicated 2000-2001
Not Adjudicated 1999-2000
Not Adjudicated 1998-1999

[ return to top ]

 




Complaints Not
Adjudicated

Not Adj Overview
Not Adj 2008-2009
Not Adj 2007-2008
Not Adj 2006-2007
Not Adj 2005-2006
Not Adj 2004-2005
Not Adj 2003-2004
Not Adj 2002-2003
Not Adj 2001-2002
Not Adj 2000-2001
Not Adj 1999-2000
Not Adj 1998-1999

 

Complaint Statistics

Statistics 2008-2009
Statistics 2007-2008
Statistics 2006-2007
Statistics 2005-2006
Statistics 2004-2005
Statistics 2003-2004
Statistics 2002-2003
Statistics 2001-2002
Statistics 2000-2001
Statistics 1999-2000
Statistics 1998-1999
Statistics 1997-1998

       
 

About the Council [ its history and benefits of self-regulation | Members] |
Adjudications | Complaints [ Privacy Standards | Complaint Procedure | Make a Complaint ] |

Public activities [ Council publications | Case Studies |
APC Fellow | Public Forums | APC Prize ] | Annual Address ] |
Freedom of the Press | What's New | APC News | Guidelines | Links |
Search this site [ by keyword or browse the sitemap ] |


   
       
 

Last updated 27 October 2009

All material ©The Australian Press Council.
Email: info@presscouncil.org.au
Copyright and Disclaimer Notice

Website Design, Construction & Maintenance by
Catherine McDonnell and The Australian Press Council.