APC News
 
May 2007 - Volume 19, No.2

News in brief - May 2007

News by email
Prize
On the Council
An article about the Council and ADR
The 'come clean' campaign
Submissions on defamatory material in the web and
   Changes to the Classification Code
Shield laws
Incorporation
Research
A Perth visit
The Annual Address
A defamation toolkit
New Zealand Press Council review
Fiji
Conciliated complaints.

 

News by email

Press Council publications will sent by email to those who ask for delivery in that form. If you want the News sent direct to you (in pdf format) please send an email to info@presscouncil.org.au with subject line 'News by email' and you will be placed on the direct email list.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

APC Prize

There will be no Essay Prize in 2006-2007. As in 2005-2006, the Council will be making a series of awards for outstanding scholarship through the various journalism departments and faculties at Australian tertiary institutions. The Council is endowing a prize worth $300 this year, either for outstanding achievement in a course directly related to the study of print journalism, particularly in the area of ethics, or for a particular piece of work in that area.

For more information on the APC Prize, its history and future
go to the APC Prize overview.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

On the Council

John Fleetwood, a public member from South Australia, and Cheryl Attenborough, a public member from Tasmania, have been re-appointed to second three-year terms by the Council. Barry Potter, who has represented regional dailies for the last three years, and his alternate Ian Pech have indicated an inability to serve additional terms. The Council is seeking the advice of the proprietors of regional dailies as to their representative for the next three years.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

In the Office

Office Manager Deborah Kirkman's article on the Press Council's use of Alternate Dispute Resolution has been posted to the Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia on-line journal, on pages 62-63 of the current issue. The URL is http://www.iama.org.au/pdf/nat0612.pdf

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Come Clean

TThe Council has launched a 'come clean' campaign to encourage governments and other holders of information to be more open with the public by providing the media with the information they need to report on matters of public interest and concern. The Council has noted the increasing decline in the openness of information providers. Whether it is through legislation that restricts material, through the use of 'spin', leaks and media management to release only a part of the story, though judicial actions that suppress material before courts, or close the courts, or through the abuse of laws intended to make information available (such as the use of conclusive certificates stop material being available under Freedom of Information laws), there has been a marked diminution in the ability of the media accurately and fairly to report matters that are properly in the public interest.

One step in this campaign was the publication of an opinion piece (A fight for freedom, written by Council Executive Secretary Jack Herman) in the Melbourne Herald Sun on 14 May. The article has been posted to the Council's website. Another step is the decision to co-host a conference with the University of Melbourne Centre for Communications and Media Law on 27 July. "Open Justice, the Courts and the Media" is to be held at Melbourne Law School. There will be four sessions: the courts and the media; suppression orders - whose interest?; contempt of court and journalist services; and Freedom of Information - the way forward. The conference is open to the public and inquiries can be made to either the Council or the CMLC.

One non-government aspect of the 'come clean' campaign will be support from the Council for media campaigns to ensure that the commercial interests of sporting bodies do not interfere with the ability of the media properly to report matters of public interest arising from sports. In this area, the Council has already expressed concerned at the failure adequately to accredit on-line journalists and the granting of exclusive rights to cover a sport or exploit images from it. The Council is also concerned when sporting bodies use internal disciplinary procedures, including fines, to try and silence participants and coaches from expressing their views on developments within the game.

In the light of its own 'come clean' campaign, the Council has welcomed the launch of the Australia's Right to Know campaign by the proprietors of the print and electronic media. The campaign will commission an audit of the current state of free speech in Australia and, on the basis of that report, will lobby governments and the judiciary, seeking a major reappraisal of laws and regulations that censor free speech and undermine the right of all Australians to get information that is relevant and important to their lives. The campaign has been supported by News Limited, Fairfax Media, the ABC, FreeTV Australia, Commercial Radio Australia, SBS, AAP and Sky News.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Posted defamatory material

The Council has made submissions to the federal, state and territory governments seeking changes to the way in which laws deal with potentially defamatory or offensive material posted by users to website discussion forums. The Council is seeking changes to the Commonwealth Broadcasting Services Act and to the state and territory Defamation Acts.

The Executive Summary of the submission to the federal government read:

The Australian Press Council brings to the attention of the Commonwealth government the problem of defamatory or offensive material being posted by users to website forum discussions and the associated exposure of publishers to the risk of liability.

A healthy democracy thrives on free discussion and debate involving as wide a range of people as possible. The evolution of the Internet has facilitated a dramatic growth in the number and range of people who are able to participate in open debate on a range of issues. The development of the online forum, often in conjunction with a weblog, is of particular significance in this flourishing of public debate. The online forum has transformed the consumption of media content from a passive activity to a vibrant exchange of views analogous to the vigorous debates that once took place upon soapboxes in public squares, in London's Hyde Park or in Sydney's Domain.

But this rejuvenation in public debate brings with it problems and risks. By facilitating the publication of user comments upon their websites, publishers expose themselves to liability for any defamatory or offensive content included in those comments.

The Press Council urges the Australian government to reform the Broadcasting Services Act in order to ensure that publishers are not exposed to excessive risk in relation to material that they have not authored.

The submissions to the state and territory governments were in similar terms, with the final paragraph of the Executive Summary reading:

The Press Council urges governments to reform the Defamation Act in order to ensure that publishers are not exposed to excessive risk in relation to material that they have not authored. Such reform could also ensure that publishers deal appropriately with defamatory posts when they are aware of them.

The complete submissions have been posted to the Press Council website (http://www.presscouncil.org.au/pcsite/fop/fop_subs/bsa_defam.html and http://www.presscouncil.org.au/pcsite/fop/fop_subs/in_dissem.html, respectively).

For more information on defamation on this website: Defamation page.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Advocacy of terrorism

The Press Council has also made a submission to the Commonwealth Attorney-General on his proposals to amend the Classification Code to prohibit publication of material advocating terrorism. The Executive Summary of the submission read:

The Press Council urges the Attorney-General to reconsider the introduction of the proposed amendment to the classification scheme. However, if the government does proceed to introduce a ban on material which advocates terrorism, the Council is of the view that the following recommendations should be implemented:

1. The definition of "advocate" should be as narrow as possible in order to avoid the unnecessary and excessive restriction of material which merely comments upon or explains ideologically or politically motivated action. The definition employed should refer to material which overtly or explicitly urges violent action. At the very minimum, the reference to "indirectly" should be omitted from any definition. Material which supports a particular political or ideological point of view should be acceptable provided it does not advocate violence.

2. Any exemptions which aim to protect freedom of speech should be included in the legislation itself. It is not sufficient to place such exemptions in the explanatory memorandum. Such exemptions should include public interest, satirical, artistic, informative, and educational purposes.

The complete submission has been posted to the Press Council website.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Protection of sources

The Press Council has been pressing the federal, state and territory Attorneys-General to follow up their commitment to introduce shield laws, protecting journalists from being forced to reveal their confidential sources. Based on a Law Reform Commission recommendation, the Attorneys-General have agreed to use the extant NSW law as the basis for their uniform legislation. The federal AG has advised the Council that federal legislation would be introduced in the Budget session and would be based on the existing NSW legislation. The federal AG was seeking to press his state and territory counterparts to enact similar provisions. The WA Attorney had suggested that his decision whether to introduce such legislation would be conditional on West Australian Newspapers replacing the editor of its daily newspaper.

Subsequently, the Council, which remains convinced that the NSW model is not sufficiently strong to protect journalists, has again written to all Attorneys drawing their attention to better models, more likely to protect journalists from being forced to choose between jail and the revelation of a confidential source, in legislation from comparable democracies. The US House of Representatives is currently dealing with a proposed new law, the Free Flow of Information Act, which is discussed by Bree Nordenson in the Columbia Journalism Review May/June 2007. The New Zealand Parliament passed a new Evidence Act that in Section 64 made protection of sources the default position from which courts can only move, in the interests of justice, in the most dire of circumstances.

New Zealand and the USA feel the need to protect journalists from having to reveal confidential sources in most circumstances important enough to develop better laws. They have in fact come up with workable solutions to the difficult task of isolating those few extreme occasions that should require journalists sources to be identified in court. They have done so while establishing a default position that courts should not allow legal fishing expeditions just because particular authorities are miffed that news the public has a right to know has been reported.

While the language of either proposal may not be the same as an Australian law would use, the Council believes that the US and New Zealand legislation both provide sound bases for a putative Australian shield law.

The Council has asked the Attorneys-General to revise the proposed uniform national shield proposals so that they would in fact protect journalists and keep them out of jail.

For more information on protection of journalists' sources on this website: Protection of Sources page.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Incorporation

The Council has reviewed and re-written its Constitution with a view to incorporating the Council under the provisions of the Associations Incorporation Act. The Council has operated as an unincorporated association up to now but the Council sees many benefits in incorporation. After consultation with its Constituent Bodies, a revised Constitution has been finalised and application for registration made to the NSW Department of Fair Trading.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Research

The Council will in 2007 publish a supplement to the State of the News Print Media in Australia report. It will seek to publish a new version of the full report in 2008. The original research in the supplement will include analyses of the fairness of election reporting in a number of Australian newspapers. Content analyses have been carried out at a number of university journalism schools and the results will be published in the SNPMA supplement, together with updates on readership and circulation figures and reports on developments in on-line news sections and in blogging.

The Council is convening another meeting with university researchers in journalism and related areas on Monday 28 May to discuss what research is occurring within universities at the moment and to see how best the Council can assist researchers in developing useful research projects.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Perth Visit

WA Chief Justice Wayne Martin addressed an Australian Press Council public meeting on Access to Justice - The Media, the Courts and the Public Record in Perth on Thursday 22 March.

Chief Justice Martin spoke about public and media access to the Courts and their records, and the principles governing that access, and the benefits to the community generally from the widest possible public and media access to the workings of their Courts. He also addressed particular aspects of access arising from the availability of new technologies, such as the Internet, and the prospect of web-based broadcasting of court proceedings. A report of his speech is in this issue of the News and the complete address has been posted to the Council's website.

The public meeting was held during a visit to Perth by the Press Council for its monthly complaints hearings and Council meeting. Chair of the forum was the Council Chairman, Professor Ken McKinnon and it was co-sponsored by Minter Ellison.

This was the Council's third visit to Perth. The previous one was in 1996.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Annual Address 2007

David Kirk, the CEO of Fairfax Media, delivered the Australian Press Council's 2007 Annual Address at a media lunch on 10 May in Sydney. His Address was entitled: Convergence: The Print Media, the New Media and Press Freedom. A report of his speech will be in the August issue of the News and the complete address has been posted to the Council's website

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Defamation toolkit

Professor Mark Pearson of Bond University advises that his journalism department's on-line Australian Journalist's Defamation Toolkit has been revised for the reformed defamation laws and can now be accessed at http://www.bond.edu.au/defamkit/default.htm.This has been acclaimed as a useful tool, particularly for regional and rural journalists.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

NZ Press Council Review

Sir Ian Barker and Professor Lewis Evans are reviewing the operations of the New Zealand Press Council. They visited the Australian Press Council on 17 and 18 April to discuss with the Chairman and Executive Secretary the way in which the Australian Council operates. The reviewers were particularly interested in the Australian council's use of conciliation techniques, in its take up of caints about matters posted to newspaper websites, and in its role as a protector of the freedom of the press, as well as of the press' responsibilities.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Fiji visit

Chris McLeod, an industry member of the Council, went to Fiji to speak at World Press Freedom Day events. There was considerable coverage of the visit and other activities, both in the print and electronic media. Mr McLeod had four meetings with various media people, including the Fiji Media Council and employees at the Fiji Times, did an interview with a journalist and gave the keynote speech.

The speech turned out to be a big occasion: there was seating for 100 people but 250 turned up. The people at the forum would have gained a clear understanding from all the speakers that journalists operate in Fiji at present under pretty trying circumstances.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Conciliated complaints

The Council office tries to solve matters by direct contact with the publication concerned. This often leads to a settlement of the matter satisfactory to both parties. On rare occasions, a Public Member of the Council will convene a face-to-face conciliation, by agreement with the parties. Below are some examples of the matters recently settled in these ways.

  • A metropolitan newspaper published an edited letter to the editor. The complainant, who was the letter writer, said the edited letter altered the meaning of its original. He requested publication of his letter, in full. A public member of the Press Council conducted a face-to-face mediation that resulted in an amicable settlement of the letter writer's concerns.
     
  • A community newspaper published an article warning residents of perfume being replaced by ether. The complainant pointed out that the scenario was an urban myth. With the assistance of the Council's office, the parties agreed on the form of words to be published correcting the article.
     
  • A regional daily newspaper published an article about a political candidate that gave incorrect details of his residential address. The secretariat contacted the newspaper, which checked the article and found it to be inaccurate. It immediately published a correction.
     
  • A metropolitan newspaper published an image to support its accompanying articles. The complainant argued that the image had been manipulated. The paper checked, and established that a new machine had been incorrectly calibrated, thus elongating the image and making other alterations. A meeting was then held between the parties, at which the complainant agreed to the paper's offer a follow-up article and the publication of a clarification.
     
  • A national newspaper published an editorial about the complainant. The editorial was inaccurate in part, and damaged the complainant's professional reputation. The newspaper published a letter from the complainant correcting the inaccuracy. He then requested a mediation for the remaining component of his complaint. The parties met to discuss the complaint. The conciliation was conducted by the Executive Secretary. The outcome of the conciliation was the publication of an op/ed piece by the complainant. Both parties were satisfied by this outcome.
     
  • A metropolitan newspaper published an opinion piece about a counselling service contract. The complainant was mentioned in the opinion piece in an inaccurate and misleading manner. A letter submitted by another interested party, correcting the inaccuracies, was published by the newspaper. It then, through the Press Council secretariat, came to an agreement with the complainant on a suitable clarification to be published at the end of the opinion writer's next column.
     
  • Another complainant was concerned at comments made in response to an article published on-line. The words used by some of the responders were offensive, contained unacceptable language and were racist. The website concerned was published by a Press Council member organisation. When the material was drawn to the newspaper's attention, all the responses to the article were removed from the website. Further, it took steps to ensure that responses were vetted before posting on the site.
     
  • A country newspaper published a photograph of an accident scene. The colour photograph visibly displayed the blood of the accident victim who had a leg severed. The police officer, who attended the scene and provided assistance to the distraught family, complained about the offensive nature of the photograph. The newspaper published a number of letters to the editor about the photograph. It also met the complainant in mediation, conducted by a former public member of the Press Council. It was agreed between the parties that the editor would write to the three people with personal involvement, explaining to them the paper's reasons for publishing the image. The complaint has led to a review of the newspaper's standards for publishing such images.

[ return to top ]

Return to APC News 2007 Index

 

Documents with the pdf icon icon require the Acrobat Reader, a Free Utility from Adobe. Click here for more information.

 




APC News Indexes

APC News 2007
APC News 2006
APC News 2005
APC News 2004
APC News 2003
APC News 2002
APC News 2001
APC News 2000
APC News 1999
APC News 1998
APC News 1997
APC News 1996
APC News 1995
APC News 1994

       
 

About the Council [ its history and benefits of self-regulation | Members] |
Adjudications | Complaints [ Privacy Standards | Complaint Procedure | Make a Complaint ] |

Public activities [ Council publications | Case Studies |
APC Fellow | Public Forums | APC Prize] | Annual Address ] |
Freedom of the Press | What's New | APC News | Guidelines | Links |
Search this site [ by keyword or browse the sitemap ] |


   
      &;
 

Last updated 1 June 2007

All material ©The Australian Press Council.
Email: info@presscouncil.org.au
Copyright and Disclaimer Notice

Website Design, Construction & Maintenance by
Catherine McDonnell and the Australian Press Council.